No. Logseq is still an active open-source project and the database version absorbed most of the development effort. Visible releases on the file-based build slowed during the rewrite, which is what prompts the question.

Logseq ships no first-party AI model. Asking your graph questions means a community plugin plus your own API key, maintained by you.

Logseq Alternative: Best Logseq Alternatives, Logseq Pricing and What to Switch To

Q: Is Logseq free?

Yes. Logseq is free and open source. The only optional cost is Logseq Sync, a beta tied to Open Collective backer tiers starting around $5 a month, which many people skip by keeping the graph folder in a cloud drive.

Q: How much does Logseq cost compared with the alternatives?

Logseq itself costs nothing. RemNote Pro is $8 a month, Capacities Pro about $9.99 a month billed yearly, Obsidian Sync $4 per user per month billed yearly, and Tana Pro $20 to $30 a month. MentalClone Starter is about $11 a month billed yearly.

Q: Can I move my Logseq graph to another app?

Yes. The file-based build stores your graph as markdown in a normal folder, and Obsidian opens that folder directly. On the database build, export to files first, then import.

Logseq is free and open source, so leaving costs you nothing in subscription terms and everything in migration time. Obsidian is the closest like-for-like Logseq alternative and keeps your notes as plain markdown on your own disk. Tana suits people who want typed structure, Capacities suits people who want sync that simply works. If the honest reason you are leaving is that the graph turned into maintenance you stopped doing, and the knowledge you actually need is sitting in PDFs and reports, MentalClone reads those files as they are and answers only from them, from about $11 a month.

✓ Upload PDF, Word, Excel, text and photographed pages, up to 100 MB a file
✓ Answers come from your own files and name the document they used
✓ No graph to maintain, no plugin to install, no sync to configure

See plans

Logseq, Obsidian, Tana, Capacities, RemNote and Notion prices come from each vendor's own pricing page.

Try it on your own writing

No account needed

Paste something you wrote (notes, an email, a transcript) Now ask your second brain a question about it

3 free questions left

What Logseq itself costs, open source

Obsidian Sync, per user per month billed yearly

$20 to $30

Tana Pro, per month

About $11

MentalClone Starter, per month billed yearly

Why people look for a Logseq alternative

Four reasons come up over and over, and each one points at a different replacement. Work out which one is yours before you compare features, because picking on features alone is how people rebuild the same graph in a new app and abandon it again six months later.

The database version changed what "your files" means

Logseq's DB build keeps a graph in a local SQLite database instead of a folder of markdown files, with an importer for moving a file graph across. The file-based build still exists alongside it. For a lot of people that is a sensible engineering call and also the exact thing they picked Logseq to avoid. The original promise was notes you could open in any text editor in twenty years, and a database file is not that.

Large graphs got slow

This is the recurring complaint in performance threads: graphs in the low thousands of pages taking a long time to open, and simple operations like expanding a bullet lagging. A small graph never hits it. Four years of daily notes hits it constantly, and it gets worse exactly as the archive you built becomes more valuable.

There is no built-in AI over your own notes

Logseq ships no first-party model. Asking your own graph a question means a community plugin plus your own API key, configured and maintained by you. That is fine if you enjoy it. It is a dealbreaker if what you wanted was to type a question and get an answer drawn from four years of your own writing.

The outliner became homework

Every linked-notes app runs on the same bargain: you maintain the structure, the structure repays you later. When the maintenance stops, the graph quietly rots and the useful material ends up somewhere else, usually in finished documents. No other outliner fixes this, because they all make the same bargain.

Best Logseq alternatives compared on price and AI

US list prices read off each vendor's own pricing page. Monthly and yearly rates are both shown where they differ, because in this category the gap is often a third of the bill.

Tool	Price (US)	Where your notes live	AI over your own material	Best for
Logseq	Free, open source. Sync is a beta funded through Open Collective backer tiers from $5 a month.	Markdown files, or SQLite on the DB version	Plugins only, with your own API key	Outliner people who want free and local and can live with the roadmap
Obsidian	Free for personal use. Sync $4 per user per month billed yearly, $5 monthly. Commercial license $50 per user per year.	Plain markdown files on your disk	Community plugins, your own API key	The closest like-for-like swap and the largest plugin ecosystem
Tana	Free tier with 50 AI queries. Pro $30 a month, $20 on the early bird yearly rate. Max $120, $80 yearly.	Hosted, in Tana	Yes, metered by query on the lower tiers	People who want notes to behave like typed database objects
Capacities	Free tier. Pro $11.99 a month, $119.88 a year (about $9.99 a month). AI add-on about $8.33 a month billed yearly.	Hosted, sync included	Paid add-on on top of the plan	People who liked the graph and are done troubleshooting sync
RemNote	Free tier with 250 AI credits a month. Pro $8 a month, $96 a year. Pro with AI $18 a month, $216 a year.	Hosted, with offline use	Yes, metered in AI credits	Anyone whose notes exist to be memorized, with spaced repetition built in
Notion	Free tier. Paid member plans, with the full AI features bundled into the Business and Enterprise tiers.	Hosted, in Notion	Notion AI, on the higher tiers	Teams that need permissions and several editors in the same pages
MentalClone	79 PLN a month (about $21) or 474 PLN a year (about $11 a month). Professional 199 PLN (about $54).	Uploaded documents you can delete at any time	Built in, and answers are restricted to what you uploaded	Large document archives you want to question rather than curate

Where Logseq still wins, and this is worth saying plainly: it is free, it is open source, the outliner model genuinely fits some people better than pages do, and block references are a real feature most of this list does not have. If those are the reasons you are there, the DB version is probably still your best option and waiting it out is a reasonable plan.

Logseq vs Obsidian: which one to switch to

This is the comparison most people leaving Logseq run first, and the answer is less about features than about how you write.

Pick Obsidian when

You write in pages rather than bullets, you want your notes to stay as plain markdown you fully control, and you want the option to extend the app with plugins. The ecosystem is the largest in the category, personal use is free, and a Logseq markdown graph imports with far less friction than most migrations.

The catch: sync is a separate $4 per user per month on yearly billing, using it at work needs the $50 per user per year commercial license, and you inherit exactly the same maintenance bargain you may be trying to escape.

Stay on Logseq when

You think in outlines, you use block references seriously, and the daily-notes-first workflow is the reason the system stuck. Obsidian can approximate all of this with plugins, but approximating it costs you configuration time and leaves you depending on plugins that one volunteer maintains.

If price is the deciding factor, note that both are free for personal use. The real bill in either app is the hours you spend keeping the structure tidy.

There is a third answer that neither comparison covers. If you keep choosing between outliners because none of them solved the original problem, the problem may not be the outliner. A full write-up of that case sits on our Obsidian alternative comparison, and the broader category view is on the personal knowledge management app page.

How to move your Logseq graph out without losing it

Four steps, in the order that keeps a bad decision reversible. Do all of them before you cancel anything or delete a folder.

Copy the whole folder first

On the file-based build, your graph is a directory of markdown with journals and pages inside it. Copy the entire directory somewhere else before you touch anything. On the DB build, use the built-in export to get files out before you migrate.

Separate notes from documents

Most graphs are two things stuck together: short notes you wrote, and attachments you collected. The notes belong in whichever app you pick next. The attachments, the PDFs, the reports, the transcripts, are usually the part you actually search for and they do not need an outliner at all.

Test with one real question

Before you move four years of material, take the twenty files you reach for most and load them into the candidate tool. Ask it the question you asked your graph last week. A migration that answers that question is worth the weekend; one that does not, is not.

Keep the archive readable

Whatever you choose, keep an exportable copy of the markdown. Every tool in this category is a subscription decision you may revisit, and the only thing that makes revisiting cheap is text you can still open without the app that made it.

Who ends up asking their documents instead

Consultants and analysts

Client reports, interview transcripts, market studies, all finished as PDFs. Typical question: "what did we recommend on pricing in the retail engagement two years ago?" The answer exists in a deliverable nobody linked into a graph.

Researchers and writers

Papers, notes from reading, drafts that never made it into the outline. Typical question: "which of these sources actually supports the claim I made in chapter three?" Being told the material is silent on it is more useful than a confident guess.

Founders and operators

Board decks exported to PDF, investor updates, policy documents, contracts. Typical question: "what did we tell investors about hiring last spring?" Consistent answers across years, without rereading every file.

Questions people ask before leaving Logseq

What is the best Logseq alternative?

Obsidian is the best Logseq alternative for most people leaving. It keeps notes as plain markdown files you own, it has wikilinks and a graph view, personal use is free, and the plugin ecosystem is the largest in the category. Choose Tana instead if you want typed structure, Capacities if you want sync handled for you, and a document-first tool if your material is PDFs rather than notes.

Is Logseq free?

Yes. Logseq is free and open source, and the desktop and mobile apps cost nothing to use. The only money involved is optional: Logseq Sync has run as a beta tied to Open Collective backer tiers starting around $5 a month, and plenty of people skip it entirely by putting the graph folder in a cloud drive they already pay for.

Is Logseq dead?

No. Logseq is still an active open-source project, and the database version is the work that absorbed most of the development effort. What people mean when they ask this is that visible releases on the file-based build slowed while the rewrite was underway, which reads as silence if you were waiting on a fix.

Is Logseq better than Obsidian?

Logseq is better if you think in outlines and use block references seriously, because both are native rather than bolted on. Obsidian is better if you write in pages, want the larger plugin ecosystem, and want first-party sync you can pay for and forget. Both keep markdown on your disk, and both are free for personal use.

Does Logseq use AI?

Logseq ships no first-party AI model. Asking your graph questions means installing a community plugin and supplying your own API key, then maintaining that setup yourself. Tools that include AI over your own material as part of the plan, such as Tana, Capacities with its add-on or a document-first app, remove that configuration step.

How much does Logseq cost compared with the alternatives?

Logseq itself costs nothing. Among the paid alternatives, RemNote Pro is $8 a month, Capacities Pro is about $9.99 a month billed yearly, Obsidian Sync is $4 per user per month billed yearly on top of a free app, and Tana Pro is $20 to $30 a month. MentalClone Starter is about $11 a month billed yearly with no question limit.

Can I move my Logseq graph to another app?

Yes, and it is easier than most migrations because the file-based build already stores your graph as markdown in a normal folder. Obsidian opens that folder directly, with the main friction being how each app writes bullets, tasks and block references. On the database build, export to files first, then import.

What if my knowledge is in PDFs rather than notes?

Then no outliner will help, because they all assume you retype or summarize the material first. A document-first tool like MentalClone reads PDF, Word, Excel, text and photographed pages directly and answers questions from them. Text PDFs are read up to 120 pages, scanned PDFs up to 40 pages with OCR, and every answer names the document it used.

Ask your archive a question before you rebuild it

Paste a page from a real report into the box at the top and ask it something you would otherwise dig for in your graph. If the answer holds up, upload the rest of the folder.

Compare plans